Critics regard Basle II as a regulatory nightmare that will impose excessively high costs on smaller banks, particularly in Asia. Analysts believe the current composition of Chinese lending books could require local banks to increase their regulatory capital. Chinese banks have significant exposure to risky corporate loans and a growing exposure to credit card loans, which have a higher capital adequacy requirement under Basle II. "… Advocates of the reform believe increased regulatory pressure to beef up risk management expertise will make the international banking system more stable and lead to business benefits for individual banks. …"
South China Morning Post notes that "… This year, Hong Kong banks were among the first in the world to comply with Basel II, which takes into account a bank's operational risk, as well as credit risk, setting a standard that better reflects the potential for loss. However, many regulators worldwide, including in the US, have yet to mandate it for all lenders, worrying that there could be greater risk due to their inability to properly deal with its complicated accounting demands".